You can read more about it here:
Many companies have emerged in recent years to capitalize on the growing interest for psychedelics’ potential therapeutic benefits. SoulCybin, a company known for both its controversies and its promises, has attracted a lot of attention. This article discusses the alleged soulcybin scam, including the claims made, the concerns raised, and what it means for the psychedelics sector.
SoulCybin, the Rise of
SoulCybin touted itself as the first platform to offer psychedelic therapy. It promised to give users access to transformative experiences by guiding them through psychedelic journeys. The company was quickly recognized by the psychedelics industry for being founded by individuals passionate about mental healing and health.
SoulCybin’s allure was its promise of safe, legal psychedelics. They provided online courses, coaching sessions, and webinars to help users explore the worlds of psychedelics. The platform promised a healing and transformational journey for those suffering from depression, anxiety or PTSD.
SoulCybin quickly found itself in the spotlight and under fire for a number of allegations. These allegations ranged between deceptive marketing tactics and financial improprieties. They began to erode SoulCybin’s credibility.
SoulCybin’s misleading marketing: Critics have accused SoulCybin for using misleading advertising techniques, leading users to expect unrealistic things about the therapeutic properties of psychedelic drugs. Users claimed that SoulCybin underplayed the dangers of psychedelics. This can include intense mental experiences and in some instances, harm.
Lack of qualifications: There have been concerns about the qualifications held by SoulCybin guides and facilitators. Many people questioned the safety offered by SoulCybin due to allegations of inadequate supervision and training.
Financial irregularities – Some users complained of billing issues and payments. There were allegations that unauthorized charges had been made and refunds were difficult to obtain. These financial disputes only increased the skepticism about the company.